On using artificial intelligence in procedural decision-making in forensic medical examination

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The article explores the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in forensic medical examination, assessing its current state and future prospects in procedural decision-making. While the integration of AI in forensic medical examination introduces new opportunities, it is equally important to consider potential risks.

The reviews research conducted by experts from various countries on the implementation of AI in forensic medical examination, with a particular focus on its role in procedural decision-making. A literature analysis reveals that forensic psychiatry leads the way in AI adoption within forensic medicine.

Based on a synthesis of scientific literature and an analysis of domestic and international experience, the authors identify key areas where AI can be applied in forensic medical examination and highlight specific aspects that require careful attention.

The introduction of AI into forensic medical examination marks a revolutionary development, offering enhanced efficiency in data analysis and interpretation. However, despite AI’s vast potential, human expertise remains irreplaceable in making critical decisions. AI is not intended to replace human judgment but rather to serve as a valuable assistant. At the current stage of technological development, human involvement is essential for interpreting context and making well-founded decisions.

The article also includes a SWOT analysis of AI applications in procedural decision-making within forensic medical examination. The findings outline the strengths and weaknesses of AI implementation.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Dinara R. Nurkeyeva

Academy of Law Enforcement Agencies Under the General Prosecutors Office of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Author for correspondence.
Email: din_uriste@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2666-4801
SPIN-code: 9626-2368

MD

Казахстан, Kosshy

Yernar N. Begaliyev

Academy of Law Enforcement Agencies Under the General Prosecutors Office of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Email: ernar-begaliev@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6659-8576
SPIN-code: 1929-3392

Dr. Sci. (Jurisprudence), Professor

Казахстан, Koshy

Maral T. Abzalbekova

Karaganda University named on E.A. Buketov

Email: abzalbekoba@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0001-9929-4816
SPIN-code: 9829-0326
Казахстан, Karaganda

Ardak A. Biyebayeva

Academy of Justice under the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Email: ardak_22@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-8961-7815
SPIN-code: 2220-8626

Cand. Sci. (Jurisprudence), Assistant Professor

Казахстан, Astana

Farida S. Zhaxybekova

Maqsut Narikbayev University

Email: zaksybekovafarida@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2770-6356
SPIN-code: 5202-1033

Cand. Sci. (Jurisprudence), Assistant Professor

Казахстан, Astana

References

  1. Barinov E. H., Tihomirov A. V. Meditsinskaıa kspertiza na pravovom pole //Meditsinskaıa kspertiza i pravo. – 2012. – №. 1. – S. 3-4.
  2. Ugolovno-protsessualnyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 18.12.2001 N 174-FZ
  3. Ugolovno-protsessualnyi kodeks Respubliki Kazahstan ot 4 iiylıa 2014 goda № 231-V ZRK.
  4. Kuppala J. et al. Benefits of Artificial Intelligence in the Legal System and Law Enforcement //2022 International Mobile and Embedded Technology Conference (MECON). – IEEE, 2022. – S. 221-225
  5. Alowais S. A. et al. Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice //BMC medical education. – 2023. – T. 23. – №. 1. – S. 689.
  6. Barinov E. H., Miheeva N. A., Kalinin R. ., Tarasova N. V. Vnutrennii kontrol kachestva sudebno-meditsinskih kspertiz po faktam neokazaniıa meditsinskoi pomoşi // Sudebnaıa meditsina. 2020;6(1):46–50. https://doi.org/10.19048/2411-8729-2020-6-1-46-50.
  7. Gavrilova IY.A. Kontseptsiıa integratsii iskusstvennogo intellekta v pravovuiy sistemu // Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta drujby narodov. Seriıa: IYridicheskie nauki. - 2021. - T.25. - №3. - C. 673-692. doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2021-25-3-673-692
  8. Hmyz A. I. Ispolzovanie vozmojnostei iskusstvennogo intellekta v sudebnoi kspertize // Vestnik konomicheskoi bezopasnosti. 2022. № 5. S. 224–227. https://doi.org/10.24412/2414-3995-2022-5-224-227.
  9. Wankhade TD, Ingale SW, Mohite PM, Bankar NJ. Artificial Intelligence in Forensic Medicine and Toxicology: The Future of Forensic Medicine // Cureus. 2022. August;14(8):e28376. 10.7759/cureus.28376.
  10. Vodanović M, Subašić M, Milošević DP, Galić I, Brkić H. Artificial intelligence in forensic medicine and forensic dentistry // J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2023 Aug 27;41(2):30-41. PMID: 37634174; PMCID: PMC10473456.
  11. Sadykov M.B., Begaliev E.N., Bahteev D.V., Kazieva A.N., Husainov O.B. Primenenie iskusstvennogo intellekta i chipirovaniıa cheloveka v sudebno-meditsinskoi kspertize: nauchnyi obzor // Sudebnaıa meditsina. 2024. T. 10, № 1. S. 000–000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/fm16093.
  12. Orakbaev A.B., Kurmangali J.K., Begaliev E.N., Syrbu A.V., Begaliev B.A. K voprosu ob ispolzovanii rezultatov virtualnoi autopsii (virtopsii) v hode rassledovaniıa prestuplenii: nauchnyi obzor // Sudebnaıa meditsina. 2023. T.9. №2. C. 183-192. doi: 10.17816/fm774.
  13. Maltsev V. A., Murjina A. S. Ispolzovanie vozmojnostei iskusstvennogo intellekta v sudebno-kspertnoi deıatelnosti. – 2023.
  14. Lefèvre, T.; Tournois, L. Artificial Intelligence and Diagnostics in Medicine and Forensic Science // Diagnostics 2023, 13, 3554. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13233554.
  15. Bahteev D. V. Iskusstvennyi intellekt: tiko-pravovye osnovy. Monografiıa. – " Izdatelstvo"" Prospekt""", 2021.
  16. Tumanova L. V. Osobennosti dokazyvaniıa po delam, svıazannym s okazaniem meditsinskih uslug //Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriıa" Pravo". – 2022. – №. 2. – S. 124.
  17. Voevodkin D.V., Rustemova G.R., Begaliev E.N., Igembaev K.A., Aiypova Z.N. K voprosu vyıavleniıa poddelnyh zakliychenii sudebno-meditsinskih kspertiz posredstvom primeneniıa tehnologii iskusstvennogo intellekta po opytu Respubliki Kazahstan: nauchnyi obzor // Sudebnaıa meditsina. 2023 T. 9, № 3 S. 287–298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/fm8270
  18. Wood, M. (2019). Customary International Law and the General Principles of Law Recognized by Civilized Nations // International Community Law Review, 21(3-4), 307-324.
  19. Horder, J. (2016). Ashworth's principles of criminal law. Oxford University Press.
  20. Peno, M. (2019). The Character of the Principles of Criminal Law and Criminal Responsibility: Between the Philosophy of Law and Semiotic // Liverpool Law Review, 40(2), 79-93.
  21. Werle, G., & Jessberger, F. (2020). Principles of international criminal law. Oxford University Press.
  22. Stoian, A., & Drăghici, T. (2015). The principle of legality, principle of public law // International Conference knowledge-based organization.
  23. Gurl E. SWOT analysis: A theoretical review. – 2017.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2024 Eco-Vector


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 81753 выдано 09.09.2021 г. 
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ЭЛ № ФС 77 – 59181 выдано 03.09.2014 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies