A COMPREHENSIVE QUESTIONNAIRE-BASED STUDY ON FORENSIC ODONTOLOGISTS’ PRACTICES IN THE REGISTRATION AND ANALYSIS OF DOG BITE MARKS IN HUMANS



Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dog bite marks and injuries on humans is a significant public health problem with relatively high frequency, impact on economic productivity and quality of life.

AIMS: This survey aimed to investigate current practices and perspectives among forensic odontologists regarding the analysis of dog bite marks, focusing on key aspects such as documentation protocols, canine examinations, DNA collection, and legal considerations across various jurisdictions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was conducted among 22 forensic odontologists to gather insights into their experiences and practices related to dog bite mark investigations. Respondents were asked about their approaches to documenting bite marks, examining suspect dogs, collecting biological evidence, and complying with legal requirements in different countries.

CONCLUSIONS: The survey findings highlight consensus on fundamental investigative steps such as photographing bite marks and conducting canine examinations. However, variations exist in practices related to DNA collection, and legal requirements across jurisdictions. These insights underscore the need for standardized protocols and further research to enhance the reliability and effectiveness of forensic analyses in this critical domain

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Galina Zolotenkova

Email: zolotenkova_g_v@staff.sechenov.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1764-2213
Russian Federation

Nikolaos Angelakopoulos

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University of Bern

Author for correspondence.
Email: nikolaos.angelakopoulos@unibe.ch
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8511-4645
Switzerland

Sudheer Babu Balla Sudheer Babu Balla

La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo,

Email: forensics.sudheer@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0977-3889
Australia

References

  1. REFERENCES
  3. Ali S.S., Ali S.S. Dog bite injuries to the face: A narrative review of the literature. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022. Vol.4, N 8(3): 239-244.
  4. Conan A., Akerele O., Simpson G., Reininghaus B., van Rooyen J., Knobel D. Population dynamics of owned, free-roaming dogs: Implications for rabies control. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015. Vol. 6, N 9(11):e0004177.
  5. Daigle L., Delesalle L., Ravel A., Ford B., Aenishaenslin C. Occurrence and risk factors of dog bites in northern Indigenous communities: A scoping review. Front Vet Sci. 2022. Vol. 18, N 9. P.777640.
  6. Román J., Willat G., Piaggio J., Correa M.T., Damián J.P. Epidemiology of dog bites to people in Uruguay (2010-2020). Vet Med Sci. 2023. Vol.9, N 5. P. 2032-2037.
  7. Yılmaz S., Delice O., İba Yılmaz S. Epidemiological characteristics, seasonality, trends of dog bite injuries, and relationship with meteorological data. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2023. Vol.30, N 2. P. 229-234.
  8. Sarenbo S., Svensson P.A. Bitten or struck by dog: A rising number of fatalities in Europe, 1995-2016. Forensic Sci Int. 2021. Vol.318, P.110592.
  9. World Health Organization. Animal Bites. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/animal-bites (Last accessed 23 January 2024)
  10. Tenzin, Dhand N.K., Gyeltshen T., Firestone S., Zangmo C., Dema C., Gyeltshen R., Ward M.P. Dog bites in humans and estimating human rabies mortality in rabies endemic areas of Bhutan. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011. Vol.5, N 11. P. e1391.
  11. Giovannini E., Roccaro M., Peli A., Bianchini S., Bini C., Pelotti S., Fais P. Medico-legal implications of dog bite injuries: A systematic review. Forensic Sci Int. 2023. Vol. 352, P. 111849.
  12. Patterson K.N., Horvath K.Z., Minneci P.C., Thakkar R., Wurster L., Noffsinger D.L., Bourgeois T., Deans K.J. Pediatric dog bite injuries in the USA: a systematic review. World J Pediatr Surg. 2022. Vol. 7, N 5(2). P. e000281.
  13. Rothe K., Tsokos M., Handrick W. Animal and Human Bite Wounds. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015. Vol. 19, N 112(25). P. 433-42.
  14. Bernitz H., Bernitz Z., Steenkamp G., Blumenthal R., Stols G. The individualisation of a dog bite mark: a case study highlighting the bite mark analysis, with emphasis on differences between dog and human bite marks. Int J Legal Med. 2012. Vol.126, N 3. P.441-6.
  15. Stavrianos C., Angelakopoulos N., Stavrianou P., Pantelidou O., Vasiliadis L., Grigoropoulos L. Comparison of human and dog bite marks. J Vet Adv. 2011. Vol. 10, P. 2649‐54.
  16. Kashyap B., Anand S., Reddy S., Sahukar S.B., Supriya N., Pasupuleti S. Comparison of the bite mark pattern and intercanine distance between humans and dogs. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2015. Vol.7, N 3. P. 175-9.
  17. Fonseca G., Mora E., Lucena J., Cantin M. Forensic studies of dog attacks on humans: a focus on bite mark analysis. Research and Reports in Forensic Medical Science. 2015. Vol. 5, P. 39-51.
  18. Benevento M., Trotta S., Iarussi F., Caterino C., Jarussi V., Solarino B. Multidisciplinary analysis of bite marks in a fatal human dog attack: A case report. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2021. Vol. 48, P. 101816.
  19. Lawrence D. Brown, T. Tony Cai, Anirban DasGupta. Interval Estimation for a Binomial Proportion. Statist. Sci. 2001. Vol.16, N 2. P. 101 – 133.
  20. Iarussi F., Cipolloni L., Bertozzi G., Sasso L., Ferrara M., Salerno M., Rubino G.T.R., Maglietta F., Dinisi A., Albano D., Iarussi V., Pomara C., Sessa F. Dog-bite-related attacks: A new forensic approach. Forensic Sci Int. 2020. Vol. 310. P. 110254.
  21. Shields L.B., Bernstein M.L., Hunsaker J.C. 3rd, Stewart D.M. Dog bite-related fatalities: A 15-year review of Kentucky medical examiner cases. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2009. Vol.30. P.223-230.
  22. Bernitz H., van Niekerk P.J. Bungled bite mark evidence collection: A proposed protocol for the prevention thereof. J Dent Assoc S Afr. 2003. Vol.58. P.16-19.
  23. Thali M.J., Braun M., Markwalder T.H., Brueschweiler W., Zollinger U., Malik N.J., Yen K., Dirnhofer R. Bite mark documentation and analysis: the forensic 3D/CAD supported photogrammetry approach. Forensic Sci Int. 2003. Vol.12, N 135(2). P. 115-21.
  24. Forrest A., Soon A. Bite marks. In: Taylor JA, Kieser JA (editors). Forensic Odontology: Principles and Practice. First published: 15 January 2016. Chapter 8.
  25. McNamee A.H., Sweet D. Adherence of forensic odontologists to the ABFO guidelines for victim evidence collection. J Forensic Sci. 2003. Vol.48. P. 382-385.
  26. Ordonnance sur la protection des animaux, du 23 avril 2008 (État le 1er février 2024) https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2008/416/fr, in French.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Supplement 1
Download (33KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) Eco-Vector


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 81753 выдано 09.09.2021 г. 
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ЭЛ № ФС 77 – 59181 выдано 03.09.2014 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies