在对骨骼残骸进行综合检查时进行身份识别的可能性:实践案例
- 作者: Tolmachev I.A.1, Lavrukova O.S.2, Antipov А.V.3
-
隶属关系:
- Kirov Military Medical Academy
- Petrozavodsk State University
- Forensic Medical Expertise Bureau of the Republic of Karelia
- 期: 卷 9, 编号 4 (2023)
- 页面: 457-464
- 栏目: 临床病例报告
- ##submission.dateSubmitted##: 23.09.2023
- ##submission.dateAccepted##: 14.11.2023
- ##submission.datePublished##: 15.12.2023
- URL: https://for-medex.ru/jour/article/view/15174
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/fm15174
- ID: 15174
如何引用文章
详细
用骨骼残骸的身份识别是法医鉴定局法医部门进行的最复杂的检查类型之一。在检查所发现的骨骼残骸时,第一阶段通常是确定骨骼残骸是否属于某人,然后确定该人的种族身份、性别、年龄和身高。已确定特征的总体情况对进一步的搜寻活动和具体个人的身份识别起着决定性作用。
本文介绍作者本人的一个案例。在一个森林地区发现了人类骨骼残骸。研究人员确定了,这些骨骼残骸属于一名高加索男性。受害者的身高很可能在173-183.5cm之间。尸骨的解剖和形态特征显示了,其年龄在49-56.5岁之间。此外,还通过检查放射影像进行了身份识别。这些图像属于52岁的N先生。专业鉴定是包括使用图形识别算法在内的方法进行的。作者还确认了,骨骼残骸属于N先生。
这个案例显示在对骨骼残骸进行综合检查时进行身份识别的可能性,也证实法医学中不明尸体的识别问题在今天仍然具有现实意义。然而,到目前为止,还没有在特定情况下应用哪一个身份识别方法的具体算法。这给最正确的方法选择造成更多困难。需要进一步改进不明尸体的身份识别方法。寻找新的、更简单的、易用和客观的检查方法既有科学意义,也有重大的现实意义。
全文:
作者简介
Igor A. Tolmachev
Kirov Military Medical Academy
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: 5154324@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5893-520X
SPIN 代码: 5794-9030
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor
俄罗斯联邦, Saint PetersburgOlga S. Lavrukova
Petrozavodsk State University
Email: olgalavrukova@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0620-9406
SPIN 代码: 6395-8638
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Assistant Professor
俄罗斯联邦, PetrozavodskАleksandr V. Antipov
Forensic Medical Expertise Bureau of the Republic of Karelia
Email: sudmedexs7@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-8853-9518
俄罗斯联邦, Petrozavodsk
参考
- Sysoev EV, Seleznev AV, Rak IP, Burtseva EV. New information technologies in forensic examination: textbook. Tambov: Izd-vo Tamb. gos. tekhn. un-ta; 2006. 84 p. (In Russ).
- Fedin IV, Chikun VI, Gorbunov NS, Hludneva NV. The problem of human identification. Bulletin Forensic Medicine. 2017;6(4):40–43.
- Zvyagin VN. Current problems of medical and forensic identification of individuals. Problemy ekspertizy v meditsine. 2012;12(3-4):39–43. (In Russ).
- Ubelaker DH, Khosrowshahi H. Estimation of age in forensic anthropology: Historical perspective and recent methodological advances. Forensic Sci Res. 2019;4(1):1–9. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2018.1549711
- Lynnerup N. Forensic anthropology and human identification. Scand J Forensic Sci. 2013;19(1):16–38. doi: 10.2478/sjfs-2013-0005
- Elliott M, Kurki H, Weston DA, Collard M. Estimating body mass from skeletal material: New predictive equations and methodological insights from analyses of a known-mass sample of humans. Archaeological Anthropological Sci. 2016;8(4):731–750. doi: 10.1007/s12520-015-0252-5
- Dolgov AA, Zolotenkova GV, Titarenko EN. Structured analysis of anthropological expertises implemented in the medical and criminalistic department of the bureau of forensic medical expertise of moscow region from 2007 to 2016. Russ J Forensic Med. 2018;4(1):17–21. doi: 10.19048/2411-8729-2018-4-1-17-21
- Bykov IYu, Kolkutin VV, Tolmachev IA, Dmitriev EG. State-legal and expert-identification aspects of protection of the right of identity of citizens of the Russian Federation. Russ Military Med J. 2000;321(4):11–14. (In Russ).
- Romanko NA, Zinin AM, Khaziev ShN. Forensic identification of the person on the basis of appearance and features of the structure body. Russ J Forensic Med. 2017;3(1):21–25. doi: 10.19048/2411-8729-2017-3-1-21-25
- Zvyagin VN, Galitskaya OI, Anushkina ES. Determination of the age of an adult by the microstructure of the periosteal part of the V metatarsal bone. Forensic Med Expertise. 2021;64(4):42–46. doi: 10.17116/sudmed20216404142
- Kalimullin RR, Zvyagin VN. Methods for diagnosing the sex of adult human by anatomical and morphological features of arytenoid cartilages. Russ J Forensic Med. 2021;7(2):83–87. doi: 10.17816/fm392
- Sjovold Т. Tables о the combined method for determination оf age аt death given by Nemeskeri, Harsanyi аnd Acsadi. Anthropologiai Közlemények. 1975;19(1):9–22.